心的唯一
Australia's defense‑funded report hypes risks to subsea cables to 'serve military goals'_我的网站
A |
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS.
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.
。
原标题：教龄满30年！罗湖区首次为非在编幼儿教师颁发金牌为提升教师的使命感和幸福感，今年，罗湖教育为教龄满30年的幼儿园非在编教师颁发荣誉证书与金质奖章。据了解，这是全市首个将幼儿园非在编教师纳入30年教龄表彰对象的行政区。表彰满30教龄非在编幼儿教师，提升职业荣誉感为进一步营造尊师重教良好社会风尚，今年8月，罗湖区教育局通过了《关于表彰年满30年教龄非在编幼儿园教师的工作方案》，首次对辖区内幼儿园年满30年教龄的非在编幼儿教师进行的表彰。罗湖区的这一举措是对无数坚守幼教事业教师们的尊重与认可，也进一步强化了幼儿教师的职业使命感和社会责任感。罗湖区童乐幼儿园胡雪峰、翠苑幼儿园王兰开、琪琪幼儿园陈春玲、长岭幼儿园许志萍、深圳市第一建筑工程公司幼儿园余笑梅、赖秋玮6人成为首批获得此项荣誉的幼儿教师。加强幼儿园师德师风建设，提升职业道德素养为进一步增强全区幼儿园师德师风建设的针对性和实效性，今年7月，罗湖区教育局印发了《罗湖区关于进一步加强幼儿园师德师风建设的通知》，包括师德教育、师德激励、师德考核与监督、师德奖惩等方面的举措。
。
B | 今年，罗湖区对师德师风管理工作进行了全面梳理，在师德负面行为清单中，涵盖了思政纪律、教育教学、廉洁从教、行为作风四个方面18条行为，明确了师德失范行为的处理办法及问责机制等。今年春季学期结束时，近3.8万名幼儿家长参与了对班级教师和保育员的师德师风评价。启动学前教育“苗圃工程”，构建人才成长梯队据悉，罗湖区于今年启动了学前教育“苗圃工程”，计划到2025年，认定区级名师60人、名师培养对象200人，“雏鹰计划”园级骨干教师约150人，成立不少于20个名师工作室，依托名师工作室及10个学区，承担起培养区级、园级骨干的培养任务，与市级“苗圃工程”相衔接，构建“区级名师——区级名师培养对象——园级骨干教师”成长梯队，建设高素质学前教育骨干教师队伍，促进幼儿园教师队伍专业化发展。目前，罗湖区共有240人申报了首批区级名师、名师培养对象及“雏鹰计划”园级骨干教师。相关负责人表示，“下一步，罗湖区将继续加强幼儿园教师队伍建设，多措并举提高幼儿教师的职业道德水平和科学保教能力，打造高素质的保教队伍，实现罗湖区‘善幼善育’的目标。”采写：南都记者 谢粤蕾 通讯员 刘梁卓返回搜狐，查看更多责任编辑：
Current article:http://uj19ke.guaxiazaopinduan.cfd/list_ml0/axkugii.html
Published on:00:00:00